Text 1
Astronomers have long wondered how tens of thousands of asteroids can persist in the main belt between Mars and Jupiter while orbiting the same star and drawing on the same material. According to conventional wisdom, gravity-driven accretion should let a few bodies sweep up the rest. So why do so many remain as separate objects after billions of years? Despite many proposed models, researchers still have not reached a fully satisfying explanation.
Text 2
Dynamical astronomer Leena Varma and colleagues connect the belt's diversity to orbital stirring. Because these rocky bodies are small and widely spaced, they rarely meet at gentle speeds. Jupiter's resonances continually jostle their paths, turning potential mergers into shattering impacts. In such conditions, direct growth by sticking probably happens far less than previously believed, which reduces the kind of head-to-head competition that the older picture assumed.
Based on the texts, how would Varma and colleagues (Text 2) most likely respond to the "conventional wisdom" discussed in Text 1?