Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-51
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Inference
Difficulty level: Easy

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Psychologist: Advocates of "aroma-priming" claim that certain scents—such as peppermint—sharpen mental focus and improve reasoning. In a recent study, volunteers solved a series of logic puzzles while a subtle peppermint scent was diffused in the room. Under a second, identical session one week later, the same volunteers were told that citrus scent would be present to "boost concentration," but in fact no scent at all was released. Comparing the two sessions, researchers found that puzzle accuracy and completion speed were just as high in the unscented "citrus" session as in the earlier peppermint-scented one.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?

AMost claims about the cognitive benefits of aroma-priming are exaggerated.
BPeppermint scent does not enhance logical reasoning any more than citrus scent does.
CThe expectation that a scent will aid concentration can by itself produce the same performance gains attributed to the scent.
DAny improvement in reasoning caused by aroma-priming disappears after a single exposure.
EPeople generally perform better on logic puzzles when no distracting odors are present at all.
» Quit