Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-RC-6
Section: Reading Comprehension

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Passage A

Hundreds of hobbyists across the Andes, the highest mountain range outside of Asia, spend their weekends racing palm-size quad-copters (small drones) through makeshift obstacle courses.

Last year, while timing a race outside Cusco, a high-altitude city in Peru, logistics engineer María Rojas noticed something odd: between heats (timed rounds of races), pilots routinely loaded spare drones with insulin vials or blood-typing kits and dispatched them to remote villages. The ad-hoc "pit-stop (a quick servicing break) supply runs," once a fun activity, soon became a parallel network.

Rojas mapped flight logs and realized that—in aggregate—the racers were performing what a regional charity had tried and failed to fund: last-kilometer medical delivery across razor-back ridges. Even more startling, the pilots had evolved their own micro-economy. A volunteer who completed a run earned prop credits, digital chits redeemable for batteries or upgraded rotors. By late spring, prop credits were trading on a private Discord channel at roughly five U.S. cents apiece. "We stumbled into a courier economy," Rojas recalls, "one powered by bragging rights and spare parts instead of payroll." What began as high-speed play, in other words, had quietly become a life-saving supply chain.

Passage B

Current aviation statutes treat all uncrewed aircraft alike, yet the emergent drone-runner network described above raises distinct regulatory puzzles. Under Peruvian law, any aircraft operating beyond visual line of sight must file a flight plan and carry liability coverage. Hobby pilots rarely do either. Still, outright prohibition could jeopardize the only timely source of insulin for dozens of mountain clinics. Air-space regulators therefore face a dilemma: how to accommodate humanitarian micro-flights without granting free hand to recreational fliers.

One solution would be a "humanitarian carve-out"—a permit tier contingent on three criteria: (1) carriage of only medical payloads supplied by licensed pharmacies; (2) pre-programmed routes capped at ten kilometers; and (3) participation in a blockchain log that records every launch, landing, and prop-credit transfer. Critics object that such a carve-out legitimizes a barter token (prop credits) that functions as quasi-currency, potentially inviting tax evasion. Yet Peruvian tax code already exempts volunteer in-kind services provided to registered nonprofits; extending that logic to digitized spare-part credits is doctrinally straightforward. By contrast, imposing conventional commercial-aviation rules would likely extinguish the very activity that regulators now grudgingly recognize as an indispensable, if improvised, public good.

Sub-Question 1 of 7

Which one of the following pairs of titles would be most appropriate for Passage A and Passage B, respectively?

A"A Couriers' Economy at Play"
"Air-Space Law Catches Up"
B"Spare Parts, Real Profits"
"Tax Loopholes in the Drone Age"
C"Recreational Racing Meets Rural Medicine"
"Designing a Humanitarian Drone Exemption"
D"How to Earn Prop Credits"
"Why Blockchain Logs Fail to Assure Safety"
E"Last-Kilometer Dreams Fulfilled"
"Can Regulators Just Say No?"
» Quit