Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-199
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Principle
Difficulty level: Medium

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Principle: A stamp expertising committee may issue an opinion on an item only if at least two of its examiners have handled the item itself and no examiner on the committee has an interest in the item's sale. A committee may withdraw an opinion it has issued only on evidence that first reached it after the opinion issued.

Which one of the following judgements conforms most closely to the principle above?

ASince Halloway's committee properly issued its opinion on the Sabden overprint, no examiner having an interest in the sale, the opinion given was sound.

BSince Ilsley's committee properly withdrew its opinion on the Deane pair, the evidence it acted on cannot have been available to anyone before the opinion issued.

CMarbeck's committee declined to give an opinion on the Rendal block, though four of its examiners had handled it and none of them had an interest in the sale; the refusal was improper.

DSince Renshaw's committee properly issued its opinion on the Ardmore essay, no examiner on that committee had anything to gain by the essay's sale.

EVantage's opinion on the Kelso cover was improper: only two of its examiners handled it, a third seeing photographs only.

» Quit