Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-197
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Justify the Conclusion (JTC)
Difficulty level: Hard

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Veneer layer: The Ashby panel took nine days at the bench and the Rendell four, and the Ashby is twice the Rendell in area. The front office puts the whole difference down to size. It cannot be put down to size alone. The Ashby is in sand-shaded veneer where the Rendell is plain.

Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the veneer layer's conclusion to be properly inferred?

AA panel that spends more days at the bench costs the shop more than one that spends fewer.

BNeither panel, the sand-shaded or the plain, was kept from the bench on any of those days for want of veneer, of glue, or of a free press to lay it in.

CDoubling the area of a panel of any veneer, in this trade, never more than doubles its days at the bench.

DSand-shaded veneer is laid piece by piece into the ground, where plain veneer of the same area goes down under the press in one operation.

ESand-shaded veneer takes longer to finish, once the panel is out of the press, than plain veneer of the same area does.

» Quit