Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-179
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Justify the Conclusion (JTC)
Difficulty level: Medium

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Lace mistress: A piece reaches the exhibition only if its ground is worked in the Bruges manner, which we teach in the second year and nowhere else; the third year teaches the Flemish. Our third-years trained nowhere but Ghent before coming to us, and Ghent teaches one ground only — the same one our third year teaches. None took our second year. So no piece of theirs will reach the exhibition.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

AA ground is worked in the Bruges manner only by a lacemaker taught that manner or shown one already worked in it, as every hand that reaches us from Ghent has been.

BHad a lacemaker who trained at Ghent gone on to our second year, a piece of hers could have reached the exhibition with its ground worked in the Bruges manner.

CA ground is worked in the Bruges manner only by a lacemaker taught that manner, in our second year or where she trained before.

DA piece reaches the exhibition only if the hand that worked its Bruges ground trained at Ghent.

EA piece from a Ghent-trained hand reaches a standard the exhibition's judges praise above our second year's.

» Quit