Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-175
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Justify the Conclusion (JTC)
Difficulty level: Medium

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Collier: The trust pays the coppice rate for wood off a cant standing seven years since its last cut. The pond and long cants were both cut when the trust took over, eleven winters ago; one of them was cut again four winters back, and no other cut has been taken. This week's stack is all off a cant cut at the takeover. So the burn earns the rate.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

ANo cant from which a cut was taken again four winters back earns the trust's coppice rate, whatever its standing.

BA cant that was cut again four winters back earns the trust's coppice rate only if a cut had been taken from it before the trust took over.

CThis week's stack is all off a cant that was cut again four winters back, and four winters since a cut is short of the standing the trust's coppice rate wants.

DThis week's stack is all off a cant from which no cut has been taken since the trust took over.

EThis week's stack is all off a cant that earns the coppice rate on its standing, unless a cut has been taken from it since the trust took over.

» Quit