Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-144
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Principle
Difficulty level: Medium

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Adjudicator: Hallam's notice misleads, and I ordered it withdrawn rather than amended. The association objects that withdrawal is reserved for repeat cases. Hallam was required last spring to amend this same notice within a month, and a year later has neither amended it nor asked for any extension of the month allowed. So withdrawal was open to me.

Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the adjudicator's reasoning?

AAn adjudicator should give an advertiser the association's reasons in writing before ordering withdrawal.

BAn adjudicator should order an advertisement amended rather than withdrawn wherever amendment would remove what misleads, however often the advertiser has been told to amend it.

CAn adjudicator may order an advertisement withdrawn only where its advertiser was already required to amend that advertisement and did not do so in time.

DAn adjudicator may order an advertisement withdrawn where a rival member was already required to amend a comparable advertisement and did not do so in time.

EAn adjudicator may order an advertisement withdrawn where its advertiser was already required to amend that advertisement and did not do so in time.

» Quit