Free LSAT Practice Question

Question 1 of 1
ID: LSAT-LR-017
Section: Logical Reasoning
Topic: Justify the Conclusion (JTC)
Difficulty level: Easy

Practice Mode: Single selected Question » Back to Overview

Planner: A street should be given over to pedestrians only where its shops live on passing trade rather than on deliveries. Every shop on Cutler Row takes deliveries twice a day, and the Row is too narrow for a van to stop without blocking it. So Cutler Row should not be given over to pedestrians.

Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion to be properly drawn?

ADeliveries to Cutler Row could be made before the shops open, at an hour when the Row is empty.

BStreets given over to pedestrians attract more passing trade than streets open to traffic, and the shops on them come to depend on that trade within a year or two.

CA street whose shops live on passing trade rather than on deliveries should be given over to pedestrians, however narrow its carriageway may be.

DA shop that takes deliveries twice a day lives on deliveries rather than on passing trade, no matter how much custom passes its door.

ESome of the shops on Cutler Row have no passing trade at all, the Row being too narrow and too far off the main street to draw walkers.

» Quit